Post by xyz3600 on Feb 25, 2024 6:35:27 GMT
The president of the Federal Supreme Court, Minister Dias Toffoli, rejected, this Thursday (22/8), a request to suspend a decision by the Superior Court of Justice that authorized the payment of R$2.7 billion in dividends by Brasken. Nelson Jr. / SCO STF Toffoli rejects suspension of injunction that released Braskem dividends. Nelson Jr. / SCO STF The request was made by the Attorney General's Office. In the decision, Toffoli states that it is not possible to comply with the request because it is still possible to appeal to the STJ. "The STF established jurisprudence in the sense that the use of injunctive suspension as a substitute for other procedural instruments provided for in legislation is not permitted.
It is concluded, therefore, that the applicant's claim falls outside the scope of injunctive suspension, since it is It deals, as stated, with a suspension request formulated against a suspension already granted by the Superior Court of Justice, with the court competent for the suspensive procedure having already exercised its assessment", says Toffoli, in an excerpt from the decision. According to Toffoli, "the hypothetical or Middle East Mobile Number List potential risk of serious harm to public interests is not sufficient to grant the suspension request." Request In June, the Attorney General of the Republic Raquel Dodge filed an appeal with the Supreme Court asking for the cancellation of the decision by Minister João Otávio Noronha, who authorized (on June 12) the company to hold a meeting with shareholders to share approximately R$2.7 billion.
Thus, the president of the STJ suspended another decision, by judge Alcides Gusmão, who (on April 15) prohibited Braskem from distributing dividends to shareholders. The main one is Odebrecht, which should keep more than half of the money.In Brazil, D&O insurance policies offer coverage A and B, forming the same 'package'. If the insured limit corresponds to 100 coins and these 100 coins are spent with reimbursement to the company (taker) — that is, coverage B — nothing will remain to the administrators as coverage A. Coverage C, if contracted, will integrate this same limit, perhaps even through the establishment of a sub-limit, but integrated into the larger limit already mentioned — the same 100 coins.This was understood by the 2nd Chamber of Business Law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, when dismissing the appeal of a company that accuses its competitor of imitating the design of its bread holder.
It is concluded, therefore, that the applicant's claim falls outside the scope of injunctive suspension, since it is It deals, as stated, with a suspension request formulated against a suspension already granted by the Superior Court of Justice, with the court competent for the suspensive procedure having already exercised its assessment", says Toffoli, in an excerpt from the decision. According to Toffoli, "the hypothetical or Middle East Mobile Number List potential risk of serious harm to public interests is not sufficient to grant the suspension request." Request In June, the Attorney General of the Republic Raquel Dodge filed an appeal with the Supreme Court asking for the cancellation of the decision by Minister João Otávio Noronha, who authorized (on June 12) the company to hold a meeting with shareholders to share approximately R$2.7 billion.
Thus, the president of the STJ suspended another decision, by judge Alcides Gusmão, who (on April 15) prohibited Braskem from distributing dividends to shareholders. The main one is Odebrecht, which should keep more than half of the money.In Brazil, D&O insurance policies offer coverage A and B, forming the same 'package'. If the insured limit corresponds to 100 coins and these 100 coins are spent with reimbursement to the company (taker) — that is, coverage B — nothing will remain to the administrators as coverage A. Coverage C, if contracted, will integrate this same limit, perhaps even through the establishment of a sub-limit, but integrated into the larger limit already mentioned — the same 100 coins.This was understood by the 2nd Chamber of Business Law of the Court of Justice of São Paulo, when dismissing the appeal of a company that accuses its competitor of imitating the design of its bread holder.